Tag Archive for: California Hague Convention

Anthony G. Joseph Is Now Licensed in California; A New West Coast Resource for Hague Convention Cases

Big news for families and practitioners: Attorney and Partner Anthony G. Joseph is now licensed to practice family law in California, focusing his practice on Hague Convention cases involving international parental child abduction and cross-border parental disputes. 

If you or someone you know is facing the wrenching uncertainty of a child taken or retained overseas, or you’re an attorney who needs a trusted co-counsel on Hague matters, Anthony’s new California admission brings proven experience and a strategic, compassionate approach to one of the most time-sensitive areas of family law.

What Is the Hague Convention and Why It Matters

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (commonly called “the Hague Convention”) is a multilateral treaty designed to provide a prompt mechanism to help secure the return of children wrongfully removed to or retained in a member country. The treaty’s core purpose is to deter international child abduction by restoring the status quo and returning children to the country of habitual residence, where custody and visitation disputes are to be decided under domestic laws.

Why it matters: When a child is taken across international borders, ordinary family law remedies are often too slow or ineffective. The Hague process provides a structured, emergency-style mechanism to request return, but success depends on speed, evidence, and legal strategy. That’s why having experienced, licensed counsel in the forum court (in this case, California) matters so much.

Why Anthony’s California License Matters

Hague Convention Attorney in California (2)

There are three practical reasons Anthony’s California admission is important:

  1. Jurisdictional Access: California courts handle Hague petitions under state law and federal implementing statutes. Having counsel licensed in the state helps ensure direct courtroom access, the ability to file without delay, and familiarity with local judges, clerks, and procedural expectations.
  2. Speed and Responsiveness: Hague cases are time-sensitive. The Convention emphasizes prompt proceedings; typically, courts aim to resolve return applications quickly. A California-licensed attorney can file immediately, attend ex parte hearings if necessary, and respond to opposing filings without the logistical delays that out-of-state counsel sometimes face.
  3. Local Practice Knowledge: Every state has its own nuances, from local rules to judicial tendencies. Anthony’s admission in California lets him combine international Hague experience with knowledge of how California courts handle evidentiary issues, urgency motions, service of process, and enforcement.

If you live in California (or a child has been brought to California), Anthony’s presence on the ground means you have an attorney who can move quickly and directly where it matters most.

Anthony’s Approach to Hague Convention Cases

Hague Convention matters require an unusual blend of legal precision, cultural awareness, and practical crisis management. Here are the central pillars of Anthony’s approach:

1. Rapid Triage and Fact Gathering

Time is the enemy in Hague cases. Anthony begins with a rapid intake to identify the child’s habitual residence, the timeline of removal or retention, relevant custody orders, passports, and travel evidence, and any documentation showing consent or lack thereof. Even small details, such as airline manifests, passport stamps, phone records, or eyewitness statements, can change the course of a Hague petition.

2. Clear Legal Analysis

Not every international move is a Hague “wrongful removal.” Anthony focuses on whether there was a “custody right” in the country of habitual residence at the time of removal and whether the removal or retention was in breach of that right. He analyzes available defenses (for example, consent, acquiescence, or grave risk of harm) and builds a precise legal strategy tailored to the facts and the forum court.

3. Tactical Litigation and Coordination with Foreign Counsel

Many Hague matters require parallel coordination with counsel in other countries, whether to obtain evidence abroad, serve process, or negotiate a diplomatic route. Anthony works collaboratively with foreign counsel and consular officials when appropriate, balancing litigation and diplomacy to achieve a timely resolution.

4. Trauma-Informed Client Care

These cases are emotionally fraught. Anthony pairs legal urgency with compassionate client communication, explaining options, managing expectations, and connecting families with practical supports like local law enforcement liaisons, child welfare agencies, or counseling referrals.

5. Post-Return Planning

A successful return under the Hague Convention is not the end; custody issues still need resolution in the child’s habitual residence. Anthony helps clients prepare for follow-up matters: custody hearings, safety plans, supervised exchanges, and compliance monitoring.

Common Hague Defenses and How Anthony Handles Them

Hague Convention Attorney in California (1)

The Convention contains a limited set of defenses that respondents commonly raise. Anthony’s defense-focused experience makes him adept at preempting and rebutting these arguments:

  • Consent or Acquiescence: The respondent may assert that the other parent consented to the move or later accepted it. Anthony investigates the timing, scope, and context of any alleged consent, using contemporaneous messages and records to challenge vague or belated claims.
  • Grave Risk of Harm: This is one of the narrowest but most serious defenses. If a respondent claims returning the child would pose a grave risk of physical or psychological harm, Anthony demands specific, corroborated evidence and explores less disruptive alternatives like supervised return or protective orders to mitigate harm while preserving the Convention’s goals.
  • Not Habitual Residence: If the respondent argues the child was already habitually resident in the new country, Anthony compiles multi-factor evidence (school records, social ties, parental intent) to demonstrate where the child’s center of life truly was at the relevant time.
  • Procedural Defenses: Failures in service, jurisdictional defects, or statute-of-limitations arguments are common tactics. Anthony’s litigation experience helps him anticipate procedural traps and ensure filings comply with California practice.

Because these defenses can be outcome-determinative, Anthony emphasizes early forensic collection of communications, travel documents, and third-party testimony.

The Typical Hague Process in California 

While every case is different, here’s a practical roadmap of how a California Hague case commonly proceeds:

  1. Emergency Intake and Petition Drafting: The attorney files a petition for return of the child in the appropriate California court, typically accompanied by a verified declaration describing facts, custody history, and supporting documents.
  2. Service on the Respondent: The respondent must be given sufficient notice. Hague cases often use expedited service methods and may involve foreign service rules when the respondent is abroad.
  3. Preliminary Hearings and Temporary Orders: Courts may hold immediate hearings to evaluate the petition, consider temporary custody or return orders, and set briefing schedules.
  4. Fact Discovery and Evidentiary Hearings: The court may order evidence exchange, declarations, or live testimony. 
  5. Decision Under the Convention: The court decides whether the removal or retention was wrongful and whether any defenses apply. If the court orders a return, mechanisms are available for supervising the safe physical return of the child.
  6. Enforcement and Follow-Up: If the respondent refuses to comply with a return order, enforcement mechanisms include contempt proceedings and coordination with federal agencies or foreign authorities. Conversely, if the court denies return (e.g., established grave risk), the case proceeds on custody merits in the country of habitual residence.

Anthony’s role is to navigate each stage efficiently and to advocate for solutions that help protect the child’s welfare while respecting the Convention’s mandates.

Practical Tips for Parents Who Suspect an International Removal or Retention

Hague Convention Attorney in California (3)

If you believe a child has been taken out of their habitual residence or retained abroad, consider these immediate steps:

  1. Act Quickly: Hague cases favor speedy action. Collect flight records, passport information (including stamps), communication logs, and any custody orders.
  2. Document Everything: Save texts, emails, social media messages, and any written agreements. Photograph boarding passes, ticket purchase confirmations, and hotel bookings if available.
  3. Contact Police and Your Local Central Authority: Report the abduction to local law enforcement and contact the Central Authority in your country (in the U.S., the Department of State’s Office of Children’s Issues). They can help coordinate international steps.
  4. Retain Hague Counsel: Secure an attorney with Hague experience and, when possible, admission in the forum state. Anthony’s recent California admission allows him to file locally and marshal resources quickly for cases involving California.
  5. Preserve Safety: If you fear physical danger to the child or yourself, alert law enforcement and consider emergency protective orders where appropriate.

These actions help preserve the evidence and build the foundation for a Hague petition.

When to Involve Foreign Counsel or Consulates

International cases often require coordinated legal work across borders. Anthony routinely coordinates with:

  • Foreign Counsel to gather evidence, serve documents, or seek local protective measures.
  • U.S. Consular Officials to assist with practical matters like verifying documents, facilitating safe travel, or liaising with foreign authorities.
  • Central Authorities in the foreign country that implement the Hague Convention at the governmental level.

This networked approach increases the speed and effectiveness of return efforts and reduces the risk of procedural gaps.

Why Families and Referring Attorneys Choose Anthony

People choose Anthony for several consistent reasons:

  • Practical Urgency: He understands the time-critical nature of Hague matters and prioritizes action without sacrificing legal precision.
  • Strategic Collaboration: He works well with foreign counsel, consular offices, and other stakeholders to create multi-front solutions.
  • Clear Client Communication: Families appreciate straightforward explanations and realistic assessments.
  • Local Courtroom Capability: With California licensure, Anthony can appear in person, meet clients locally, and pursue urgent relief before California judges.

For referring attorneys, Anthony offers dependable co-counsel services: quick intake, meticulous petition drafting, and courtroom representation in California.

Realistic Expectations 

It’s important to be realistic about outcomes. The Convention’s goal is to return to the country of habitual residence, not an immediate decision on long-term custody. Even when a child is returned, custody disputes may continue in the home country. 

Additionally, certain defenses, especially credible claims of grave risk, can prevent return. 

Finally, enforcement can be challenging if a respondent refuses to comply; in those instances, diplomatic, judicial, and sometimes law enforcement resources must be coordinated.

Anthony will always give candid assessments of the likely legal paths and will prepare clients for both best-case and worst-case scenarios while fighting tenaciously to protect the child’s welfare and parental rights.

Example Case Types Anthony Handles

To give a sense of real-world situations where Anthony’s California licensure helps, here are some common scenarios (illustrative, not client specifics):

  • A child habitually resident in Europe is brought to California by one parent after a short vacation; the left-behind parent seeks immediate return under the Hague Convention.
  • A California parent’s ex-spouse retains the child in a foreign country after an international move, and the California parent seeks a return and temporary protective custody pending proceedings abroad.
  • A cross-border relocation where the respondent claims consent; Anthony investigates contemporaneous messages and transactional evidence to test that claim under California court rules.
  • A parent alleges a grave risk of harm if the child is returned; Anthony works to produce corroborated evidence and propose protective measures that would permit return without exposing the child to danger.

Each fact pattern requires customized legal analysis and different levels of international coordination.

Real Results: Successful Hague Cases

Masters Law Group has successfully represented parents in numerous high-profile Hague Convention cases across the U.S. Below are a few recent examples:

2025:

2024:

2023:

Prior:

How to Get Help Right Now

If you’re in California and facing an international child removal or retention, quick action matters. Here’s a suggested first step:

  1. Gather immediate facts: child’s name and age, passport number, most recent location of habitual residence, dates of travel, custody orders, and any communications about the travel or consent.
  2. Contact a Hague attorney: because Anthony G. Joseph is now California-licensed and concentrating on Hague matters in the state, he can accept local filings, coordinate urgent hearings, and work with foreign counsel as needed.
  3. If this is an emergency involving safety, contact local police and the appropriate Central Authority (for U.S. cases, the Department of State’s Office of Children’s Issues).

Please note: this blog provides general information only and does not provide legal advice for any specific situation. For a case assessment tailored to your facts, contact qualified counsel promptly.

Final Thoughts

Hague Convention Attorney in California (4)

International child abduction is uniquely painful and legally complex. The Hague Convention provides a crucial tool to defend children’s right to stability and to ensure custody disputes are decided in the proper forum. Anthony G. Joseph’ admission to the California bar expands access to experienced, locally available counsel for families and professionals needing swift Hague relief in California.

If you’re in California or have a child who has been brought to California without authorization, Anthony’s California licensure, combined with his Hague experience, means you can take immediate legal steps with someone who understands both the international treaty framework and California’s procedural landscape.

If you’d like help drafting a petition, coordinating with foreign counsel, or understanding the next steps, contact an experienced Hague attorney now. Early action preserves your options. Anthony G. Joseph is now accepting Hague Convention cases in California and stands ready to help families navigate the urgency and complexity of cross-border child recovery.

Contact Masters Law Group here today.

Disclaimer: This blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal assistance, please contact the qualified attorneys at Masters Law Group. Our firm can help you handle your family law case in Illinois, including divorce, custody, and mediation services.

Parental Child Abduction Precautions

The end of the year can be an emotionally taxing time, especially after a recent divorce or separation. However, it’s important to recognize this period can also be marked by increased worries about parental child abduction.

Parental child abduction involves one parent unlawfully taking their child without the consent of the other parent. This often results in a traumatic experience for all parties involved. In this blog, we will highlight the importance of holiday precautions to mitigate the risk of parental child abduction. Let’s delve into what you should know during this critical time.

Understanding Parental Child Abduction

Parental child abduction is a heart-wrenching scenario that unfolds when one parent takes their child across international or state borders without the consent of the other parent or in violation of a custody order. The end of the year is a time when parents should be vigilant. This is a time that can get hectic, especially with the holidays. Given the intricate nature of parental child abduction and its profound emotional impact, protecting your family from such a traumatic experience is of utmost importance. Let’s delve into some scenarios where parental child abduction can potentially occur.

Common Motivations for Parental Child Abduction

The holiday season can sometimes exacerbate the factors that drive parental child abduction, making it even more important to prioritize communication and legal protection during this time. Parental child abduction can have various motivations, but one common factor is changes in parenting or visitation rights. In fact, in as many as 65% of cases, abductions occur shortly after a parent’s rights in this regard have been modified.

Regardless of the motivations, parental child abduction can have severe consequences for the parties involved. Some other common factors that can drive a parent to abduct their child include:

  • Custody Disputes: Parents embroiled in heated custody battles may see abduction as a way to gain a strategic advantage in court proceedings.
  • Relocation Desires: Sometimes, a parent may desire to relocate with their child to a different area, often to sever the child’s connection with the other parent.
  • Family Conflicts: Disagreements and conflicts within extended families can occasionally escalate to the point where one parent attempts to abduct the child as a means of retaliation or control.

Understanding these motivations is crucial in preventing and addressing parental child abduction, as it allows for better preparation and intervention when needed.

Preventing Parental Child Abduction

Preventing parental child abduction requires vigilance, communication, and the implementation of practical precautions. Here are some crucial steps you can take to protect your child during the year-end holidays:

  • The continuity of the parent-child relationship is typically in the child’s best interest.
  • The needs of children change and grow as they mature.
  • Custodial parents make daily decisions (including emergencies) while the child is with that particular parent.
  • Both parents are to have access to a child’s official records.

A parenting plan will give you and your child an added layer of protection should they be abducted. If you have concerns about potential abduction, notify law enforcement and relevant legal authorities. They can provide guidance and take action if necessary. It’s always best to consult an experienced family law attorney regarding effective travel consent letters and their limitations.

Working with a Child Abduction Lawyer

Dealing with parental child abduction, whether within the U.S. or internationally, presents significant challenges for parents and children. Seeking legal assistance is crucial in effectively navigating parental child abduction cases. When you partner with an experienced child abduction attorney, such as those at Masters Law Group, you gain the support needed to advocate for your family’s best interests. 

  • Enforcing Court Orders: If the other parent violates existing custody or visitation orders, your attorney can help you take legal action to enforce these orders.
  • Counseling and Emotional Support: Child abduction cases can be emotionally challenging for both parents and children. A compassionate child abduction attorney understands the emotional toll and can provide guidance and support throughout the legal process.
  • International Legal Network: Attorneys with experience in international child abduction cases often have extensive legal contacts worldwide. This network can be invaluable in tracking down abducting parents and ensuring that international laws are upheld.
  • Parental Reunification: In cases where a child has been taken across international borders, your attorney can facilitate the Hague Convention.

Working with a child abduction attorney is essential when dealing with parental child abduction cases. These professionals bring legal experience, emotional support, and a deep understanding of the complexities. With their help, you can better navigate the legal system and work toward a resolution that protects your family’s well-being.

Final Thoughts

Parental child abduction is a distressing issue that can have lifelong consequences for children and their left-behind parents. As we approach the year-end holiday season, families must prioritize the safety and well-being of their children.

With a strong focus on assisting clients in Chicago and Chicago’s Western Suburbs (Elmhurst, Hinsdale, DuPage, Oakbrook), Masters Law Group offers various services to help families through difficult times like Divorce and parental child abduction.

If you require legal assistance, contact a member of our legal team today. Our attorneys will work with you to develop an appropriate action plan for your unique needs and goals. We will work diligently on your behalf and provide regular updates.

Contact us today to set up a complimentary consultation.

Debunking Common Myths About The Hague Convention

The Hague Convention has gained widespread attention across the globe, yet many parents in the United States still have much to discover when it comes to its true purpose and potential in Parental Child Abduction. 

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a treaty that many countries, including the United States, have joined.

The purpose of the Convention is to protect children from the harmful effects of international abduction by a parent by encouraging the prompt return of abducted children to their country of habitual residence and to organize or secure the effective rights of access to a child. The idea is that custody and visitation matters should generally be decided by the proper court in the country of the child’s habitual residence.

Today, we debunk myths and show you how the convention can be beneficial. Here’s what you need to know.

Myth 1: The Hague Convention is only applicable in cases of child abduction

One of the most common misunderstandings surrounding The Hague Convention is the belief that it is limited to international child abduction cases. While it is true that the convention places significant emphasis on addressing child abduction, its reach extends far beyond this context. The Hague Convention also addresses other critical aspects related to the well-being of children.

An important objective of The Hague Convention is to swiftly return children who have been wrongfully removed or retained by one parent without the consent of the other. This provision helps ensure that children are kept from their custodial parent in a foreign jurisdiction with a proper legal basis.

Furthermore, The Hague Convention recognizes the importance of regular contact and access between children and both of their parents when living in separate nations. This provision promotes a balanced approach that seeks to preserve meaningful relationships and minimize disruptions in a child’s life.

Myth 2: The Hague Convention automatically guarantees the return of a child

Contrary to popular belief, the Hague Convention does not guarantee the automatic return of a child in all cases. However, it is essential to understand that the convention has a legal framework for facilitating the return of a child. But certain circumstances, defenses and exceptions may arise.

One exception is when there is a genuine concern of physical or psychological harm to the child if they were to be returned to their country of habitual residence. The Hague Convention recognizes the importance of the child’s well-being and safety. 

If it can be established that there is a grave risk of harm, the courts may decide not to order the child’s return, prioritizing their best interests. The convention strives to strike a delicate balance between facilitating the return of children in most cases while safeguarding their well-being and protecting their fundamental rights.

Myth 3: The Hague Convention favors mothers over fathers

Another common misconception is that the Hague Convention tends toward mothers over fathers. However, the gender-neutral convention aims to protect the child’s best interests rather than select one parent. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining regular contact between the child and both parents, assuming no risks to the child’s well-being.

The Hague Convention recognizes that children benefit from having a meaningful and ongoing relationship with both parents. It promotes the principle of shared parental responsibility and seeks to maintain regular contact between the child and both parents, irrespective of gender. The convention operates under the assumption that the involvement of both parents contributes to the child’s well-being and healthy development.

When a case arises under The Hague Convention, the focus is not on selecting one parent over the other. Ultimately, the court will determine what arrangement best serves the child’s best interests. The courts consider various factors, such as

  • The child’s age.
  • Attachments and mental stability.
  • The ability of each parent to provide a nurturing environment.

The goal is to arrive at a decision that ensures the child’s overall welfare and enables them to maintain a meaningful relationship with both parents.

Myth 4: The Hague Convention is impossible to navigate

The Hague Convention can vary depending on factors such as legal representation and the case’s complexity. However, the convention also encourages countries to assist parents lacking resources, ensuring that constraints do not impede access to justice.

These central authorities are vital in facilitating communication and cooperation between the countries involved in a case. They work together to locate the child, gather necessary information, and resolve the situation quickly. The Hague Convention highlights the importance of minimizing a child’s time separated from their custodial parent. This allows them to maintain stability in their lives.

Furthermore, the U.S. Department of State and an experienced Family Law Firm dedicated to International Parental Child Abduction cases can also help to enforce the safe return of your child or children.

Myth 5: The Hague Convention is universally accepted and followed by all countries

One important misconception to address is the belief that The Hague Convention is universally accepted and followed by all countries. While the convention has substantial international recognition, not all nations have ratified or acceded to its provisions. This can create complexities, particularly in cross-border child abduction cases, where one or both countries are non-signatories.

Ninety-three countries have ratified The Hague Convention, demonstrating a widespread acknowledgment of its importance in stopping international parental abduction and related matters. These countries have committed to implementing the convention’s principles and cooperating at every stage to help ensure the prompt return of abducted children.

However, it is crucial to recognize the challenges when dealing with countries that have not fully implemented The Hague Convention. In such cases, the lack of a recognized legal framework can complicate efforts to return an abducted child. This can also alter effective communication and cooperation between jurisdictions.

Final Thoughts

The Hague Convention is a critical international treaty that provides essential protection for children against the detrimental consequences of cross-border abduction and retention. It is vital to distinguish between truth and misinformation to promote a clearer understanding of the convention’s purpose. We can foster greater awareness and appreciation for The Hague Convention by dispelling misconceptions.

Voted Best Law Firm 2023, Masters Law Group is home to the best highly-experienced family law attorneys, Erin E. Masters and Anthony G. Joseph, who possess extensive knowledge in Hague law. Our dedicated team of professionals is well-equipped to navigate the intricate landscape of international law, delivering robust representation in these complex and high-stakes proceedings.

Contact our office today to schedule your consultation and gain valuable insights into your case.

Highlighted Hague Decisions:

MASTERS LAW GROUP CASE REVIEW: HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION: Cyprus and California, USA

In one of our most recent Hague Convention cases, a child was wrongly removed from his residing home in Cyprus and taken to the United States. The attorneys at Masters Law Group succeeded in this landmark ruling in favor of our client.

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a crucial treaty that provides a legal framework for resolving cases of international child abduction. This convention aims to ensure the prompt return of children who have been wrongfully removed or retained from their country of habitual residence.

However, navigating these complex cases can be challenging, especially without the proper legal representation. At Masters Law Group, our team of Hague-experienced attorneys understands the intricacies of this International law treaty and can provide comprehensive support to families facing international child abduction matters.

In this recent case, the husband – represented by Masters Law Group –  filed a petition for the return of his child who was taken from his residence in Cyprus to the United States by his wife – the mother of the child.  The Hague Convention provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

CASE OVERVIEW

The ex-husband filed a petition for the return of his child, a 12 year-old who was visiting his mother in the state of California. This case arises under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act. 22 U.S.C. § 9001 et seq., which implements the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Act entitles a person whose child has been wrongfully removed from his custody in another country and taken to the United States to petition in federal or state court for the return of the child.

In December 2022, the court held a five-day bench trial. The parties had stipulated that the 12-year old had been wrongfully retained under the convention. The trial focused on two affirmative defenses which were ‘grave risk’ and ‘mature child’ defenses.

CASE DETAILS

In this case, the child had lived most of his life in Cyprus. His father had full custody of him since his parents’ separation in 2014. Last summer of 2022, the minor came to the United States for a six-week visit with his mother in California. At the end of the visit, his father came to collect his son but was unsuccessful. The 12-year old has autism and had become determined not to return to Cyprus. Furthermore, his mother refused to turn him over when she was legally obliged to.

Nearly one week after the scheduled meet up went awry, the father filed a Hague Convention petition. The Court observed the 12-year old in chambers, where he answered questions from the Court and counsel for both sides without his parents present. The 12-year old was understandably subdued, but he was composed and calm through several hours of questions from strangers. That time observing the child, (after having had the benefit of testimony and reports from the experts) confirmed that he is on the Autism spectrum.

CASE RESULTS

Both the United States and Cyprus are signatories to the Hague Convention. It is implemented in the United States by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act. 22 U.S.C. §§ 9001 et seq. District courts have concurrent original jurisdiction over actions brought under ICARA. § 9003(a)–(b).

In adjudicating a petition under the Hague Convention, a court may only decide whether the child should be returned to their country of habitual residence. Both the treaty and the statute explicitly preclude courts from making a final custody determination.

The question at hand was where any further custody dispute over the child should play out, not whether living in one country or the other, or with one parent or the other, would be in his best interests.

Both parties agreed that Cyprus was his country of habitual residence at that time; and that the ex-husband was exercising his custody rights as entered by a Cypriot court. Dkt. No. 42. 

The final part of the Convention’s grave-risk exception states that a Court may decline to return a child if it would place the child in an “intolerable situation.” Convention art. 13(b). Exactly what beyond physical or psychological harm would constitute an “intolerable situation” is unclear. It was concluded the child’s life in Cyprus with his father was not intolerable.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the court granted the petition and ordered the child to return to Cyprus in the custody of his father. In addition, the Court will not impose a longer stay without agreement from both sides. As the Court is ordering the return of a child pursuant to an action under 22 U.S.C. § 9003, it is required to order the respondent to pay necessary expenses incurred by the petitioner—including legal fees and transportation costs related to the return of the child—unless the respondent establishes that such order would be clearly inappropriate. § 9007(b)(3).

READ THE FULL CASE REVIEW HERE

HAGUE CONVENTION – INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION LAW WITH MASTERS LAW GROUP

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive experience in cases involving international child custody disputes in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system.

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive knowledge and experience with The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) that was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”) which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION

If you are faced with instituting or defending child abduction proceedings under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction involving the United States, work with the experienced lawyers at Masters Law Group. Contact us here today to schedule a consultation.

Hague Convention – International Child Abduction California

International Parental Child Abduction is on the rise. Here’s what you need to know.

International child abduction cases can be extremely difficult and delicate situations. The Hague Convention was enacted into law to help parents whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained from their custody by enabling them to petition for the child’s return to their country of habitual residence. Navigating this law can be tricky and if you’re in a situation where the Hague Convention is applicable, it’s important to have an attorney that’s highly experienced in international law.

Luckily, the award-winning attorneys at Masters Law Group have successfully represented clients in such cases across the country and globe; including cases involving families in Washington State, California and internationally in New Zealand, but to name a few. If you need help with an international child abduction case, we can help.

Here’s everything you need to know about the Hague Convention and International Child Abduction California. 

History of The Hague Convention

The Hague Convention is essentially a treaty that a number of countries joined starting in 1983. The purpose of the Convention is to protect children from the harmful effects of international abduction by a parent by encouraging the quick return of the child to their country of habitual residence. Additionally it helps to organize and secure the effective rights of access to a child.

Hague Convention Framework

The Hague Convention framework was created to help countries find solutions for challenging custody cases where a child has been abducted. There are a number of instances where this can occur, but the most common is when a child is wrongfully removed from their habitual home and taken to a foreign country. 

When a parent’s custody rights are violated, a custody order is not needed to prove parental parenthood. Additionally, a child being returned to their place of habitual residence does not depend on the immigration status or nationality of the child or their parents. 

When an international abduction happens, the Central Authority are responsible for the following: 

  • Being the point of contact for the parents and children in the international child abduction case.
  • Help locate the child. 
  • Encourage a solution that favors both parents.
  • Submit documents as part of the application that are admissible in courts in both countries.

What’s Needed to File a Convention Case California

Filing a case under the Hague Convention doesn’t immediately guarantee the return of a child. First, the following must be demonstrated:

  1. The child was habitually residing in one Convention country and was wrongfully removed or retained to another.
  2. The removal or retention was considered wrongful if it was in violation of custodial rights and those rights were being exercised at the time of removal or retention.
  3. The Convention was in force between the two countries at the time of wrongful removal or retention.
  4. The child is under 16 years of age.

Hiring a Hague Convention Lawyer 

With the difficulty of international child abduction and Hague Convention cases, it’s essential to hire an attorney with extensive international law experience. At Masters Law Group, we are highly experienced in international and family law matters. Our goal is to make the legal system easier to navigate for our clients. We will make sure you clearly understand the legal situation and your rights so you can make the best decisions for you and your family. 

Instead of trying to navigate international law issues alone, take advantage of the experience and knowledge of our attorneys at Masters Law Group. We are committed to vigorously representing you in these high-stakes proceedings. 

Contact us to schedule your consultation here today.