Tag Archive for: International Child abduction

Family Child Abduction

The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children estimates that approximately 200,000 of the 260,000 children abducted each year are taken by a parent or other family member. Family Child Abduction is a very serious criminal offense that can have devastating effects on children and parents.

Family child abduction is illegal in every state, and it is often treated as a felony-level offense that can result in prison upon conviction. In many cases, family abductions occur in the midst of bitter divorce or child custody battles. The child may be kept beyond a court allotted visitation period or the parent may pick up the child from school or daycare without permission and not return the child. In other cases, a child may be abducted by a family member and may face physical or sexual abuse.

The Frightening Family Abduction Statistics

David Finkelhor, director of the Crimes against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire, led a team of researchers who sought a better estimate of the prevalence of family abduction. They used data from three waves of the National Surveys of Children’s Exposure to Violence (NatSCEV), sponsored by the U.S. Department of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2008, 2011 and 2014, the surveys asked children aged 10 to 17 years about their life experiences. Information about children aged 9 and younger was gathered from caregivers.

Some key findings:

  • 4 percent of children in the sample had experienced family abduction and 1.2 percent had experienced it within the past year. Based on this information, the researchers estimate that 875,000 children a year – 12 per 1,000 — are either abducted by a relative.
  • Parents were the perpetrators in more than 90 percent of abductions. Mothers and female family members were responsible for the majority – 60 percent. However, fathers and male relatives were responsible for 64 percent of all abductions.
  • Children who have been abducted are more likely to be from low-income households and have separated, estranged or divorced parents. In two-parent families, an estimated nine children per 1,000 experience an abduction compared to 84 per 1,000 in single-parent households.
  • 43 percent of abductions were reported to the police, including 86 percent of family abductions.

If you are facing a family abduction matter, call the police immediately. These cases are treated very seriously and many AMBER alerts that are issued stem from family abductions. Even where the child may not face an imminent threat of physical harm, law enforcement will treat these types of abductions as high priorities and will work to return the child to his or her parent.

International Family Abductions

International child abduction is a distressing problem that impacts numerous families worldwide. This issue has profound emotional, psychological, and legal implications for those involved. Due to the increasing ease of international travel, these cases are sadly on the rise.

But what classifies as International Parental Child Abduction? As per Travel.State.Gov, international parental child abduction is the removal or retention of a child outside their country of habitual residence in breach of another parent or guardian’s custody rights.  The Office of Children’s Issues within the U.S. Department of State is a leader in U.S. government efforts to prevent international parental child abduction (both from the United States and to the United States), help children and families involved in abduction cases, and promote the objectives of the Hague Abduction Convention.

Causes and Factors of International Child Abduction

A variety of factors drive international child abduction. Child abduction often occurs after separations, divorces, or custody disputes. Let’s take a look at some additional factors that contribute to international child abduction:

  • Cultural and Economic Reasons: Globalization and increased international mobility have prompted some parents to return to their native countries, often taking their children. These reasons are often influenced by a desire to maintain cultural connections, be closer to extended family, or seek better economic opportunities in their home nation.
  • Fear of Child’s Well-being: Concerns about the child’s safety in the other parent’s environment can drive some parents to abduct their child when they believe it offers better conditions.
  • Parental Alienation: In some cases, one parent might feel alienated from the child due to actual or perceived biases in the custody proceedings. Parental Alienation can foster desperation, prompting the alienated parent to resort to drastic measures like abduction to regain control over the situation.
  • Lack of Robust Legal Framework: Different legal systems and international treaties across countries are challenging. Not all countries are part of the Hague Convention of Civil Aspects. The lack of a legal framework in certain countries creates loopholes that abducting parents might exploit. The absence of streamlined procedures for cross-border child custody disputes can complicate efforts to prevent international abduction.

To effectively tackle the underlying issues of international child abduction, it’s essential to take a thorough approach. An effective process might involve enhancing parents’ communication and establishing robust support systems. We can work together to prevent the detrimental effects of international child abduction families by addressing these factors across borders.

Preventing  Child Abduction

When parents can’t agree on where a child should live, working with an attorney experienced in child abductions can help. If you think the other parent has taken your child, here’s what you can do:

  1. Get a Court Order or Custody Decree: It’s essential to have a clear court order that outlines custody arrangements and travel restrictions. This order can help prevent unwanted travel with the child. Court orders can also address matters like passports and custody details.
  2. Consult a Child Abduction Attorney: Talk to an attorney who knows about these situations. They can help you understand your options and might suggest getting an order that stops the child from leaving the country.
  3. Look for Warning Signs: Watch for sudden changes in the other parent’s life, like quitting a job or selling a home. These changes could indicate plans to move. You can find more information on our Resources for Parents page.
  4. Tell the Police and Share Court Orders: Inform the local police about the situation and give them copies of your court orders, including any custody, protection, or restraining orders you have.
  5. Contact a Foreign Embassy or Consulate: If your child is a dual national of another country, consider contacting that country’s embassy or consulate.
  6. Know About Travel Rules: The United States doesn’t have strict rules for children leaving the country. Even without both parents’ agreement, a child can cross borders. Without a clear court order saying otherwise, it can be challenging for law enforcement to stop an abduction.

If you believe your child has been abducted, always start by calling the police.

Work With a Child Abduction Attorney 

Dealing with international child abduction situations presents significant challenges for parents and children. Seeking the assistance of a child abduction attorney is a crucial step in ensuring the safe recovery of your child.

Taking swift action is necessary if you ever face a child abduction case. In such situations, partnering with an experienced child abduction attorney is needed. Their experience becomes crucial for initiating a Hague Convention application for scaling a defense against any Hague Convention-related legal actions. 

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph are highly experienced in handling disputes related to international child abduction, particularly within the jurisdiction of the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system. Voted 2023’s Best Lawyers® in America 2023, Masters Law Group is focused on solving problems and achieving the best possible result for our clients, and more importantly, any children involved. 

Contact us to set up a complimentary consultation today to discuss your situation.

The Hague Convention and Joe Jonas & Sophie Turner’s Custody Battle

Actress Sophie Turner has initiated a Hague Convention petition claiming her estranged husband, singer and actor Joe Jonas, ‘will not consent’ for their children to ‘return’ to England with her. Here’s a look at the details behind the case, plus we’ll take a look at other celebrities who have had high-stakes custody battles over the years.

After filing for divorce, Sophie Turner’s ex, Joe Jonas, is in a custody dispute over their two children: Willa, 3, and a 14-month-old daughter referred to as D. In her lawsuit, Turner alleges that Jonas is withholding their children’s passports, preventing them from joining her in England.

Best known for playing Sansa Stark on HBO’s Game of Thrones, Turner said in her petition that the couple had planned to raise their daughters in her native country. It also said the girls “are both fully involved and integrated in all aspects of daily and cultural life in England”.

Sophie Turner filed her petition under the child abduction clauses of the Hague Convention.

What is the Hague Convention?

International family law can be complex and challenging, especially concerning child custody disputes. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, aka the Hague Convention, is an international treaty that protects children from parental abduction across international borders.

The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980 Hague Convention) is a multilateral treaty that establishes proceedings for the prompt return of children who have been wrongfully removed or kept away from their home country. Currently, there are 101 Contracting States to the Hague Convention. Including the United States and the United Kingdom.

How Did They Get Here?

When Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas met through mutual friends in 2016, they kept most of their relationship out of the private eye. But things started to change after Joe proposed just one year after their relationship began. The couple went on to tie the knot at an epic wedding in Las Vegas in 2019, with a second wedding in France. In 2020, the introduced their first child to the family unit, and a second in 2022. But just a year later and four years after saying “I do”, they decided to go their separate ways.

Earlier this week, Turner was photographed having dinner with pop star Taylor Swift – who dated Jonas in 2008. Online gossip blogs were in overdrive as photos of the two, walking along arm-in-arm, went viral.

Despite calling the split “amicable”, Jonas, 34, filed for divorce in a Florida court on September 1, but according to Turner, 27, she only learned about the divorce through the media five days later. Jonas has disputed this saying he did not surprise Turner with divorce papers but rather filed for divorce after what he said were “multiple conversations with Sophie”.

Wherever the truth lies in who initiated the divorce and how, the focus remains on their children and where they will reside.

The plan was for Turner to travel to New York after filming wrapped on September 14 to collect the children, but in the meantime “the breakdown of the parties’ marriage happened very suddenly,” Turner said. Turner says she and Jonas saw each other on September 17 — and she asked him for the children’s passports so she could take them back to England.

But Jonas refused to turn over the girls’ passports, who were born in the US, and have dual US-British citizenship. Turner then filed her petition, now public, which Masters Law Group has revised, in federal court in New York under the child abduction clauses of the Hague Convention — an international treaty aimed at compelling the return of a child taken from their country of “habitual residence.”

The Turner/Jonas Hague Convention Case

The court filing says the girls are temporarily living with Turner in a Manhattan hotel.

Joe Jonas has released a statement in response to Turner’s lawsuit. The statement mentioned that the former couple had a “cordial” meeting in New York, during which they discussed working together for an amicable co-parenting arrangement. However, hours later, Turner expressed her desire to permanently take the children to the UK. The statement read, “Less than 24 hours later, Sophie advised that she wanted to take the children permanently to the UK. Thereafter, she demanded via this filing that Joe hand over the children’s passports so that she could take them out of the country immediately.” This has been reported by PEOPLE.

Sophie Turner claims that she and Joe Jonas agreed during discussions on Christmas in 2022 to make England their “forever home.” According to the documents, they sold their Miami home and were in the process of buying a new residence in the English countryside in April.

“The children were born in the US and have spent the vast majority of their lives in the US. They are American citizens,” the spokesperson said.

They added that Jonas wished for Turner to “reconsider her harsh legal position and move forward in a more constructive and private manner” and that “his only concern is the well-being of his children.”

Jonas has also denied Turner’s claims in the court documents that she found out about the divorce from media reports – saying she was aware in advance.

Celebrities & Child Custody/Parental Responsibilities Cases

Unfortunately, Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas aren’t the first Hollywood couple to face divorce cases involving parental responsibilities (formerly Child Custody) disputes.

Celebrities who have been involved in high-profile child custody battles in the past, include:

  1. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt: This Hollywood power couple had a highly publicized custody battle following their divorce in 2016. They reached a temporary agreement, and the case has seen various developments since then and still ongoing.
  2. Halle Berry and Gabriel Aubry: Halle Berry and her ex-boyfriend Gabriel Aubry had a contentious custody battle over their daughter, Nahla, following their separation.
  3. Usher and Tameka Foster: Singer Usher and his ex-wife Tameka Foster were involved in a custody battle over their two children, which resulted in Usher gaining primary custody.
  4. Kelly Rutherford and Daniel Giersch: The “Gossip Girl” actress Kelly Rutherford had a prolonged custody battle with her ex-husband Daniel Giersch over their two children, involving international custody issues.
  5. Britney Spears and Kevin Federline: Pop star Britney Spears and her ex-husband Kevin Federline had a custody dispute over their two sons after their divorce.
  6. Alec Baldwin and Kim Basinger: Actor Alec Baldwin and actress Kim Basinger had a highly publicized custody battle over their daughter, Ireland, which lasted for several years.
  7. Charlie Sheen and Denise Richards: Actor Charlie Sheen and his ex-wife Denise Richards were involved in a custody dispute over their two daughters.
  8. Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva: Actor Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva had a custody battle over their daughter after their tumultuous relationship ended.

Legal Assistance & Representation

It’s not just celebrities like Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas who are involved in international child abduction cases. If you are facing a similar legal battle, seeking the assistance of an attorney experienced in the Hague Convention can help you understand your legal options and how to take immediate action.

These attorneys possess the necessary knowledge and experience to guide parents through the legal process and protect their rights. If you have concerns about custody of your child and where they will reside, it is crucial to take proactive measures to safeguard their well-being. Your attorney may recommend several preventative measures, such as:

  1. Obtaining a custody order or parenting plan that clearly outlines each parent’s rights and responsibilities, including travel restrictions.
  2. Adding your child’s name to a watchlist to prevent unauthorized removal from the country.
  3. Obtaining a court order requires surrendering your child’s passport or imposing restrictions on international travel.
  4. Collaborating with your child’s school or daycare to establish security measures and emergency protocols.

As for Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas, the case continues. Read the “Verified petition for return of children to England” here.

 


 

 

The Hague Convention and Family Law: FAQs

Parental child abduction is a living nightmare for parents and families across the globe. But what happens when your child is taken overseas? Continue reading here to find out.

Living in an interconnected world makes it easier for families to extend across international borders. However, this can lead to legal challenges that require cross-country cooperation and understanding.  The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) is a treaty that many countries, including the United States, have joined. Its purpose is to protect children and their parents from the harmful effects of this growing crime.

If you have urgent questions or suspect you may face the scenario of International Parental Child Abduction in the future, here are some key questions and answers that could help.

FAQ 1: What Is The Hague Convention?

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained their custody may petition for the child’s return to their country of habitual residence. This treaty was developed by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) and entered into force in December 1983.

There are over 93 countries that participate in the treaty. This treaty governs the way other countries’ legal systems work together. There were two specific goals in mind at the time of The Hague Services Convention’s formation:

  • Create a means to ensure that judicial and extrajudicial documents to be served abroad can be brought to the notice of the addressee in sufficient time.
  • Improve the organization of mutual judicial assistance.

FAQ 2: How Important is Habitual Residence?

Habitual residence is a crucial concept within the Hague Convention. It refers to where a child has established a regular, integrated, and stable life. Determining habitual residence is essential in deciding which country’s legal system should govern issues like custody and visitation. This prevents parents from moving their children to another country to gain a legal advantage in custody disputes.

A left-behind parent pursuing their child’s return must demonstrate that the child was subjected to wrongful removal or retention per the Convention’s definition. It involves proving that the child’s habitual residence was in a foreign country immediately before the alleged illegal action occurred. The left-behind parent must also confirm their custody rights during the purported wrongful removal or retention.

FAQ 3: What issues arise in cross-border disputes under the Hague Convention?

There an infinite issues that could arise when dealing with international disputes. Often, many challenges intertwine legal, cultural, and jurisdictional complexities. While the Hague Convention emphasizes the prompt return of abducted children, certain exceptions exist, known as Hague Convention Defenses:

Defense 1: That the petitioner (parent seeking the return of the child) was not “actually exercising custody rights at the time of the removal or retention” under Article 13.

Defense 2: The petitioner “had consented to or acquiesced in the removal or retention” under Article 13.

Defense 3: More than one year passed from the time of the wrongful removal or retention until the date the petitioner commenced a judicial or administrative proceeding for the child’s return under Article 12.

Defense 4: The child is old enough and has a sufficient degree of maturity to knowingly object to being returned to the petitioner. It is appropriate to heed that objection under Article 13.

Defense 5: That “there is a grave risk that the child’s return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation,” under Article 13(b), and

Defense 6: That return of the child would subject the child to violation of basic human rights and fundamental freedoms under Article 20.

Furthermore, when a child has dual nationality, conflicts might arise regarding which country’s laws should be applied. Effective communication between the legal systems of different countries can also be hindered by language barriers, slowing down the resolution process. As these cases touch upon the sensitive matters of a child’s welfare and custodial rights, working with an established Hague Convention Attorney can help guide you through these challenging scenarios.

FAQ 4: How Does the Hague Convention Interact with Family Law Matters?

Central authorities are vital in facilitating communication and cooperation between the countries involved in a case. They work together to locate the child, gather necessary information, and resolve the situation quickly. The Hague Convention highlights the importance of minimizing a child’s time separated from their custodial parent. This allows them to maintain stability in their lives.

Mediation methods can also offer a more amicable solution to family disputes. Integrating mediation into the Hague Convention proceedings could allow families to address their concerns outside the courtroom, reducing emotional distress and fostering cooperative outcomes prioritizing the children’s well-being.

Furthermore, the U.S. Department of State and an experienced Family Law Firm dedicated to International Parental Child Abduction cases can also help to enforce the safe return of your child or children.

How Can I Find a Hague Convention Attorney?

To help ensure you have the best possible outcome in your Hague Convention case, you should seek an attorney who understands the intricacy of dealing with state, federal, and international laws.

Family law attorneys Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph of Masters Law Group have extensive experience in cases involving international child abduction disputes in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system. Our unique depth of knowledge, experience, and talent in the Hague Convention field highlights our competence in providing legal counsel for these fast-paced and stressful scenarios. 

For more information on our experience, here are a few of our highlighted Hague Convention cases:

Contact our office today to schedule your consultation.

The Role of a Child Abduction Attorney

It’s every parent’s worst nightmare; your child has been taken by your ex. Let’s explore the warning signs, risks, and impact of this troubling phenomenon and learn how a Family Law Attorney can help.

Imagine the heart-wrenching reality that unfolds every 40 seconds—a child goes missing. The world of child abduction is a global crisis that demands urgent attention. In this blog, we delve into the intricate legal processes that govern child abduction cases both here in the U.S. and across international borders, shedding light on the vital role of child abduction attorneys.

Understanding Child Abduction

Child abduction is a distressing problem that impacts numerous families worldwide. The gravity of this situation necessitates the assistance of attorneys experienced in child abduction who can provide the necessary legal help.

Child abduction is when someone (a stranger or family member) takes a child without legal permission, causing great distress and separation from the family. These frightening situations also occur worldwide, impacting families across the globe. In such complex cases, seeking the assistance of a child abduction attorney becomes vital. Child abduction can occur in various contexts and for different reasons. It is important to differentiate between two types of child abduction:

  • Domestic Child Abduction:
    • Parent or family member taking a child without permission or against a court order.
    • Arises from custody disputes, parental alienation, or perceived harm.
    • Usually occurs within the same country.
  • International Child Abduction:
    • Children are taken across international borders without consent or violating a court order.
    • Motives include custody disputes, parental child abduction, or escaping danger.
    • Requires coordination between different countries’ legal systems via The Hague Convention.

When a child is abducted, the consequences can be severe for both the child and the left-behind parent. The child may experience emotional distress, confusion, and trauma. It is crucial to act swiftly and decisively to ensure the child’s safe return. This is where your family law attorney experienced in child abduction plays a vital role as advocates, working towards the child’s safe return.

The Crucial Role of Child Abduction Attorneys

Family Law Attorneys who are highly versed in child abduction cases provide legal representation and advocacy for families during these high-stakes situations. These dedicated legal professionals possess comprehensive knowledge of child custody, child abduction, and the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Attorneys understand the intricate legal landscape surrounding these domestic and international cases. They are well-versed in the specific laws and procedures governing child custody disputes and the unlawful removal or retention of children.

One of the primary roles of child abduction attorneys is championing the child’s best interests in the abduction case. They recognize that children are often the most vulnerable parties in such situations and strive to protect their rights throughout the legal process. These cases involve intricate legal procedures and the application of domestic and international laws. A skilled child abduction attorney from a reputable law firm with a nationwide and global reach is equipped to handle the complexities of these cases.

Navigating the Legal Complexities: The Hague Convention

The Hague Convention provides a framework for cooperation between signatory countries in resolving international child abduction cases. This law establishes guidelines for promptly returning wrongfully removed or retained children. Child abduction attorneys with experience in The Hague Convention guide families through the legal process to maximize the chances of a successful outcome.

Under the Hague Convention, attorneys can initiate legal actions to secure the child’s return to their home country. They assist families in filing applications for the child’s recovery. They also work with central authorities to facilitate communication, gather evidence, and coordinate efforts for the child’s safe return.

At Masters Law Group, our skilled attorneys work with local authorities in the destination country to monitor compliance with court orders and take necessary actions to facilitate the child’s return if there are any obstacles or delays. Through tireless efforts, we aim to reunite families, advocating for the child’s safe return and contributing to the overall well-being of all parties involved.

Trust in Masters Law Group

It is important to work with experienced professionals who understand the safety and well-being of your child. Masters Law Group, led by Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph, is ideal for handling such delicate, time-sensitive matters.

Ms. Masters and Mr. Joseph have extensive experience in cases involving international child custody disputes in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system.

We have extensive knowledge and experience with The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) that was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”) which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

Featured Hague Decisions:

Final Thoughts

Are you facing or at risk of the daunting scenario of child abduction? Don’t navigate this complex journey alone. Take the first step toward securing your child’s safety and well-being by scheduling a consultation with our dedicated team at Masters Law Group. Together, we’ll fight for your family’s rights and ensure a brighter future for your child.

Contact us today to set up your complimentary consultation.

Understanding the Hague Convention: What U.S Families Need to Know

Understanding the Hague Convention is crucial for families across America facing international custody disputes.

International family law can be complex and challenging, especially concerning child custody disputes. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, aka the Hague Convention, is an international treaty that protects children from parental abduction across international borders. In this blog, we will explore the critical aspects of the Hague Convention and what American families must know. 

What is the Hague Convention?

The Hague Convention is an international agreement that provides a legal framework for the prompt return of children who have been wrongfully removed or retained outside their home country. The convention guarantees that parents must return children involved in international custody cases to their habitual residence. This deters parents from attempting to relocate children across borders without the other parent’s consent or a court order.

The original Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 were massive, multi-part international treaties that established certain guidelines of international law, including rules of engagement that countries agreed to follow during times of war. In the decades since, many additional Hague conventions have taken place and the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) was established as a permanent organization with the goal of establishing and supporting a set of unified international laws.

Each section and installment of the Hague Conventions has been signed, ratified, and entered into force by a different selection of countries. As such, any list of “Hague countries” based upon a single convention would be suspect and inadequate. However, as of March 2022, the HCCH itself includes 91 permanent members: 90 countries (nearly all of which are also members of the United Nations) and the European Union itself, which is classified as a “Regional Economic Integration Organisation (REIO). HCCH also includes 65 “connected parties” which are not full members, but are either in the process of becoming a member or have signed, ratified or agreed to observe one or more HCCH Conventions (full list can be found here).

How does the Hague Convention work?

The left-behind parent can initiate legal proceedings for the child’s return when someone wrongfully removes or retains them in a Hague Convention country. The central authority in the country where the child is located, such as the U.S. Department of State’s Office of Children’s Issues, plays a crucial role in coordinating efforts to find the child and facilitate their return.

Under the Hague Convention, the child’s return is the primary objective, and the legal proceedings focus on determining the child’s habitual residence and whether their removal or retention violated the custody rights of the left-behind parent. The Hague Convention does not address custody or visitation rights issues but instead focuses on the prompt return of the child to their country of habitual residence. 

What should U.S-based families know?

The United States signed the Convention in 1994, and the Convention entered into force for the United States on April 1, 2008.

American families need to understand the importance of the Hague Convention when they find themselves involved in international custody disputes. If you find yourself in this situation, here are some tips you can follow.

  • Prompt action is crucial: If you believe your child has been wrongfully removed or retained in a Hague Convention country, it is essential to act promptly. Initiating legal proceedings increases the chances of a successful resolution.
  • Contact the central authority: In the United States, the Office of Children’s Issues within the U.S. Department of State serves as the foremost authority for Hague Convention matters. They can provide valuable information, resources, and assistance locating and returning your child.
  • Gather evidence: It is essential to gather evidence demonstrating your child’s habitual residence and the wrongful removal or retention. Documentation such as birth certificates, custody orders, and communication records can strengthen your case.
  • Consulting with a family law attorney: A family law attorney with experience in Hague law matters is highly recommended. They can guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of the Hague Convention.

It’s essential to prepare for challenges. International custody disputes can be emotionally demanding. Preparing for language barriers and cultural differences can also lengthen the process.

Working With A Hauge Attorney

Engaging a Hague attorney increases the likelihood of resolving your custody dispute efficiently and effectively. These attorneys deeply understand the Hague Convention and its application in the United States. They can guide you through the complex legal processes and advocate for your rights and interests. One of the primary advantages of working with a Hague attorney is their experience in mediation and negotiation. These methods aim to resolve custody disputes outside of court by facilitating constructive dialogue and finding mutually agreeable solutions.

At Masters Law Group, we understand the complexities involved in international custody disputes and the importance of finding a resolution that aligns with your objectives. Our attorneys will tirelessly advocate for your interests and work towards a favorable outcome. We prioritize open communication with our clients and strive to provide personalized attention to address your concerns and ensure you are well-informed throughout the legal process.

Final Thoughts

Understanding the Hague Convention is essential for families across America facing international custody disputes. Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive knowledge in handling cases involving international child custody disputes, representing clients in the United States federal court system.

To demonstrate our competence, here are a few recent Hague decisions we have successfully managed:

If you or someone you know is facing the distressing possibility of international parental child abduction, please do not hesitate to reach us.

Contact us today to schedule your complimentary consultation.

Mastering Hague Law With Masters

The Hague Convention protects children from international parental abduction and returns them to their home country residence. It can also include child custody conflicts when a parent or guardian resides in a different country to the home country of the child.

Going through a divorce is never easy, especially when children are involved. However, things can get even more complicated when one parent tries to take the children across international borders. Parents are often left in a legal quagmire with high stakes and convoluted laws in these cases. But you don’t have to face it alone. The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction helps navigate these complex custody cases.

In this blog, we will delve into the details of The Hague Convention and how Masters Law Group can assist. Keep reading to discover everything you need about this crucial legal resource.

Understanding The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction

The International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA) rules how U.S. courts implement the Hague Convention. The Convention applies in cases where a child has been wrongfully removed from their habitual residence without parental consent. Hague Law establishes a Central Authority in each partner country to act as a point of contact for parents and children in international child custody cases. The Central Authority helps with the following:

  • Be the point of contact for parents and children in international child custody cases.
  • Help locate abducted children.
  • Encourage solutions that work for both parents.
  • Submit documents as part of the application are admissible in courts in partner countries.

Understanding how the Hague framework operates is crucial; let’s dive into who the Hague Convention applies to.

What Countries Are a Part of  The Hague Convention?

It’s important to note that the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction applies only to countries that have signed and ratified it. As of 2023, there are currently 91 signatory countries, but it’s essential to consult with a Hague lawyer to determine whether the Convention applies to your case.

For a full list of participating treaties, click here. 

Additionally, the Hague Convention only applies to children under the age of 16. Some signatory countries may have different age limits or apply the Convention to older children. It’s crucial to understand that the Hague Convention’s primary goal is to promote the return of wrongfully removed children to their country of habitual residence. To navigate complex legal proceedings in the country where your child habitually resides, seeking guidance from a Hague lawyer is highly recommended.

Hiring A Hague Lawyer

Attorneys experienced in The Hague Convention are crucial when it comes to navigating international child abduction. If you are concerned that your child may be at risk of abduction, it’s essential to take proactive measures to protect them. An experienced Hague Convention lawyer can help you assess the risk of abduction and develop a plan to safeguard your child’s well-being.

Some preventative measures that your attorney may recommend include:

  • Obtaining a custody order or parenting plan that specifies each parent’s rights and responsibilities, including travel restrictions.
  • You request that your child’s name be added to a watchlist to prevent them from being removed from the country without your consent.
  • Obtain a court order that requires surrendering your child’s passport or restricts international travel.
  • Establish security measures and emergency protocols by working with your child’s school or daycare.

If you are concerned about the possibility of parental child abduction, contact your family law attorney immediately to discuss your options and develop a plan that will help ensure your child’s safety.

Working With Masters Law Group

At Masters Law Group, our knowledgeable Hague lawyers are here to help you navigate the complex legal proceedings related to international child abduction, including coordinating with the Central Authority and representing you in court. Serving clients in Cook County and DuPage County Illinois, we can assist you in determining whether the Convention applies to your case – and how – based on the laws of the country where your child resides.

Our award-winning attorneys, Erin E. Masters and Anthony G. Joseph, have vast experience in international family law. You can rest assured we will work aggressively to advocate on your behalf.

As a testament to our experience, see some of our recent Hague decisions here:

If you or a loved one is facing the possibility of international parental child abduction, don’t hesitate to reach out to us. We are here to help you protect yourself and your children.

Schedule your complimentary consultation here today.

What is The Hague Convention? (INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION)

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction provides an expeditious method to return a child internationally abducted by a parent from one member country to another. The powerful international treaty can yield beneficial results when implemented correctly and appropriately.

The Hague Convention has been in the headlines recently regarding the war with Russia and Ukraine. This has left many across the globe asking, “What is the Hague Convention?”.

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

The International Criminal Court in the Hague has issued an arrest warrant against Russian President Vladimir Putin. It accuses him of being responsible for war crimes in Ukraine, including the unlawful deportation of children. Russia’s Commissioner for Children’s Rights, Ms Maria Lvova-Belova, is also subject to an arrest warrant.

According to Ukraine, tens of thousands of possible war crimes have been carried out by Russian forces since they invaded Ukraine in February last year. The Hague Convention doesn’t just apply to war crimes; it also affects everyday civilians across the globe when their child has been wrongfully removed from their habitual residence.

Divorce and The Hague Convention

When parents divorce, deciding how to handle issues regarding their children can be intense. When parents originate from separate countries, these disputes can quickly become complicated, especially when one parent attempts to move children across international borders.

When this happens, you need a Hauge lawyer who is highly experienced in international law. They understand how to settle matters of jurisdiction involving courts in the United States and other countries across the globe (if these nations are a part of the convention).

The Hague Convention’s applicability can be determined by two factors:

(1) whether both parents have consented to their child’s removal from one country to another; or

(2) if a child has been wrongfully removed from one country and brought into another country without either parent’s consent.

Hauge Law is created in order to protect you and your family both nationally and internationally.

INITIATING THE PROCESS

Deciding whether to file a Hague application is an important decision and must be considered based on each case’s specific circumstances. Perhaps after separating from their partner, a parent wants to take their child and move to another country. Maybe a parent moved internationally in violation of a custody agreement.

Filing a case under the Convention does not guarantee that your child will be returned. To obtain the return of your child through a Hague proceeding, you must first be able to demonstrate the following:

  • That your child was habitually resident in one Convention country and was wrongfully removed to or retained in another Convention country;
  • The removal or retention of your child is considered wrongful if it was in violation of your custodial rights, and you were exercising those rights at the time of the removal or retention, or you would have been exercising them but for the removal or retention.
  • The Convention must have been in force between the two countries when the wrongful removal or retention occurred (the dates are different for every country); (Note: In many instances, when a country accedes to the Convention, it is not automatically partners with all of the other countries who have ratified or acceded to the Convention.  Countries must accept another country’s accession to the Convention under the terms described in the Convention before a treaty partnership is created.
  • The child is under the age of 16.

WHY CHOOSE MASTERS LAW GROUP?

International custody issues can be incredibly difficult to deal with as a parent because of the concern you have for the safety and security of your child, and should be handled properly by a knowledgeable attorney.

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive experience in cases involving international child custody disputes and kidnapping in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system.

Read the details of our most recent successful Hague Convention cases below. Furthermore, see what our clients have to say on representing their Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction case:

 

I had a very difficult case in the United States Federal Court. My ex husband filed a Petition against me under the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child abduction asking to return our two sons to Lithuania. Seeking for the legal representation, I was advised by the U.S. Department of State to contact lawyer Erin E. Masters. I was so lucky to have the team of the best lawyers Erin E. Masters and Anthony G. Joseph representing me in this difficult trial.

They represented with the highest standards of law, but also provided support and empathy through the process. The communication was fantastic, always answered every question, explained every situation and possible outcome. As it was a very fast track case, Erin and Anthony worked hard including weekends to prepare everything for the hearing. There was only one hearing and the Decision was totally in my favor. All my family, especially the kids, are very grateful! It is also fair to mention that the legal expenses for the amount of services provided was very very reasonable.

I will gladly recommend Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph to represent any of my friends and family in need of an excellent and highly professional family attorney.

— Aistė Šulcaitė

FINAL THOUGHTS

Instead of trying to figure out international law issues alone, contact the Family Law Attorneys at Masters Law Group. Serving clients in Cook County and DuPage County Illinois, our experienced team will help you navigate the legal complexities of your case and are committed to vigorously representing you in these frightening, high-stakes proceedings.

Contact us to schedule your consultation here today. 

Featured Hague Decisions:

MASTERS LAW GROUP CASE REVIEW: HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION: Cyprus and California, USA

In one of our most recent Hague Convention cases, a child was wrongly removed from his residing home in Cyprus and taken to the United States. The attorneys at Masters Law Group succeeded in this landmark ruling in favor of our client.

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a crucial treaty that provides a legal framework for resolving cases of international child abduction. This convention aims to ensure the prompt return of children who have been wrongfully removed or retained from their country of habitual residence.

However, navigating these complex cases can be challenging, especially without the proper legal representation. At Masters Law Group, our team of Hague-experienced attorneys understands the intricacies of this International law treaty and can provide comprehensive support to families facing international child abduction matters.

In this recent case, the husband – represented by Masters Law Group –  filed a petition for the return of his child who was taken from his residence in Cyprus to the United States by his wife – the mother of the child.  The Hague Convention provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

CASE OVERVIEW

The ex-husband filed a petition for the return of his child, a 12 year-old who was visiting his mother in the state of California. This case arises under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act. 22 U.S.C. § 9001 et seq., which implements the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Act entitles a person whose child has been wrongfully removed from his custody in another country and taken to the United States to petition in federal or state court for the return of the child.

In December 2022, the court held a five-day bench trial. The parties had stipulated that the 12-year old had been wrongfully retained under the convention. The trial focused on two affirmative defenses which were ‘grave risk’ and ‘mature child’ defenses.

CASE DETAILS

In this case, the child had lived most of his life in Cyprus. His father had full custody of him since his parents’ separation in 2014. Last summer of 2022, the minor came to the United States for a six-week visit with his mother in California. At the end of the visit, his father came to collect his son but was unsuccessful. The 12-year old has autism and had become determined not to return to Cyprus. Furthermore, his mother refused to turn him over when she was legally obliged to.

Nearly one week after the scheduled meet up went awry, the father filed a Hague Convention petition. The Court observed the 12-year old in chambers, where he answered questions from the Court and counsel for both sides without his parents present. The 12-year old was understandably subdued, but he was composed and calm through several hours of questions from strangers. That time observing the child, (after having had the benefit of testimony and reports from the experts) confirmed that he is on the Autism spectrum.

CASE RESULTS

Both the United States and Cyprus are signatories to the Hague Convention. It is implemented in the United States by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act. 22 U.S.C. §§ 9001 et seq. District courts have concurrent original jurisdiction over actions brought under ICARA. § 9003(a)–(b).

In adjudicating a petition under the Hague Convention, a court may only decide whether the child should be returned to their country of habitual residence. Both the treaty and the statute explicitly preclude courts from making a final custody determination.

The question at hand was where any further custody dispute over the child should play out, not whether living in one country or the other, or with one parent or the other, would be in his best interests.

Both parties agreed that Cyprus was his country of habitual residence at that time; and that the ex-husband was exercising his custody rights as entered by a Cypriot court. Dkt. No. 42. 

The final part of the Convention’s grave-risk exception states that a Court may decline to return a child if it would place the child in an “intolerable situation.” Convention art. 13(b). Exactly what beyond physical or psychological harm would constitute an “intolerable situation” is unclear. It was concluded the child’s life in Cyprus with his father was not intolerable.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the court granted the petition and ordered the child to return to Cyprus in the custody of his father. In addition, the Court will not impose a longer stay without agreement from both sides. As the Court is ordering the return of a child pursuant to an action under 22 U.S.C. § 9003, it is required to order the respondent to pay necessary expenses incurred by the petitioner—including legal fees and transportation costs related to the return of the child—unless the respondent establishes that such order would be clearly inappropriate. § 9007(b)(3).

READ THE FULL CASE REVIEW HERE


HAGUE CONVENTION – INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION LAW WITH MASTERS LAW GROUP

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive experience in cases involving international child custody disputes in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system.

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive knowledge and experience with The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“The Hague Convention”) that was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”) which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained in the United States may petition for the child’s return to his or her country of habitual residence.

SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION

If you are faced with instituting or defending child abduction proceedings under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction involving the United States, work with the experienced lawyers at Masters Law Group. Contact us here today to schedule a consultation.

How to Handle Out of State Child Support Cases in Illinois

The purpose of a child support order is to help ensure children receive the care they need. But what happens when one parent is ordered to pay child support out of state? Or even outside of the United States?

In Illinois, there are specific laws and procedures in place to handle out-of-state child support cases. This includes those involving international borders and the Hague Convention. Here’s what you need to know about handling out of state child support cases in Illinois.

What is Child Support?

A child support order is determined by what is reasonable and necessary for the support of the child or children. It is presumed that the guideline support amounts represent the amount of support that is reasonable and necessary, unless it can be demonstrated to the court that circumstances exist that would make the guideline amount inappropriate.

Understanding the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA)

The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) provides a framework for child support cases when parents live in different states. Illinois, like most other states, has adopted UIFSA. This means that if the non-custodial parent lives in another state, Illinois can still enforce the child support order.

Under UIFSA, the state where the child resides has jurisdiction over the case. The state where the non-custodial parent lives must follow the laws of the state where the child resides. If you are facing child support issues across state lines, it is crucial to work with a family law attorney who can navigate the complexities of UIFSA and help you achieve a favorable outcome.

Seeking Assistance from the Illinois Child Support Services (CSS)

In the event that the non-custodial parent lives out of state, but you have a child support order in Illinois, the Department of Illinois Child Support Services (DCSS) can provide assistance. DCSS offers the following services to help you:

  • Enforcing the child support order across state lines
  • Modifying the child support order if necessary
  • Establishing paternity
  • Locating the non-custodial parent

DCSS can also work with the federal government to enforce child support orders across international borders. However, it’s important to note that DCSS is not able to provide legal advice and cannot help with the following:

  • Obtaining a divorce or property settlement
  • Modifying a custody or visitation order
  • Obtaining an order for college expenses.

Enforcing Child Support Orders Across International Borders

Illinois can enforce a child support order even if the non-custodial parent lives in another country. OCSE is the U.S. Central Authority for international child support. They work with states and countries to provide assistance to families seeking support when family members live in different countries.

U.S. states process cases with certain countries under different types of reciprocity arrangements, including:

  • Hague Convention countries — countries that have joined the Hague Child Support Convention, and
  • Foreign reciprocating countries (FRCs) — countries and Canadian provinces/territories that have bilateral arrangements with the U.S. government and have not joined the Hague Convention.

Since 2017, the U.S. has participated in an international agreement to streamline child support arrangements around the world, and collecting support from parents who move overseas is now possible in many countries. The purpose of the Hague Convention is to protect children from the harmful effects of international abduction by a parent by encouraging the quick return of the child to their country of habitual residence. Additionally it helps to organize and secure the effective rights of access to a child. Over 80 countries, including the United States are members of the Convention.

According to the Hague Convention, Illinois has the authority to request that the country where the non-custodial parent resides enforces the child support order. As long as the child support order is recognized in that country’s legal system, the country is obligated to comply with the request.

If you are dealing with child support issues across national or international borders, it is essential to work with a knowledgeable family law attorney. Law firms with extensive experience in cases involving international disputes can guide you through the complexities of the Hague Convention and help you protect the best interests of your child.

Working with a Hague Convention Lawyer

When faced with desperate situations, some parents may resort to non-legal means of retrieving their child, such as traveling to the foreign country themselves. However, it’s important to understand that such extra-judicial methods can breach both U.S. federal laws and foreign country laws, and may even make the situation worse.

To ensure the safety and well-being of everyone involved, it’s recommended to hire a Hague Convention lawyer. Masters Law Group can provide expert guidance and support throughout the Hague process to ensure the best possible outcome for all parties concerned.

To read some of our Featured Hague Decisions, see below:

About Masters Law Group

Erin Masters and Anthony Joseph have extensive experience in child support cases involving national and international disputes in both courts located in the State of Illinois and the United States federal court system.

Don’t navigate international law issues alone, trust the knowledge of the attorneys at Masters Law Group. We are passionate advocates for our clients and we work tirelessly to achieve a favorable outcomes for you and your child/children.

To schedule a consultation with one of our attorneys, contact us here today.

Hague Convention – International Child Abduction – Washington State

International parental abductions of U.S. children have been reported in countries all over the world, including Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, Philippines, and the United Kingdom. Navigating international child abduction cases in Washington State can be a legal minefield. During these situations, knowing your legal rights and options through the Hague Convention could prove detrimental to protecting the victims involved.

“International parental kidnapping can have serious emotional, psychological, and even physical consequences for the abducted child.”

– A Law Enforcement Guide on International Parental Kidnapping, U.S. Department of Justice

Every day, children are wrongfully removed from their residing homes and taken to a foreign country, in violation of parental rights.

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction provides an expeditious method to return a child internationally abducted by a parent from one member country to another. The powerful international treaty that can yield beneficial results when it is implemented correctly and appropriately.

Here’s everything you need to know about international child abduction and the Hague Convention for residents of Washington State.

WHAT IS THE HAGUE CONVENTION? 

The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects on International Child Abduction was enacted into law through the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA) which provides that a parent whose child has been wrongfully removed from or retained their custody may petition for the child’s return to their country of habitual residence. This treaty was developed by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) and entered into force in December of 1983.

The countries that participate are also included in a large treaty that governs the way different legal systems work together. The two main goals were to:

  • Create a means to ensure that judicial and extrajudicial documents to be served abroad can be brought to the notice of the addressee in sufficient time.
  • Improve the organization of mutual judicial assistance.

FILING A CASE UNDER THE HAGUE CONVENTION IN WASHINGTON STATE

Filing a case under the Hague Convention doesn’t immediately guarantee the return of a child. First, the following must be demonstrated:

  1. The child was habitually residing in one Convention country and was wrongfully removed or retained to another.
  2. The removal or retention was considered wrongful if it was in violation of custodial rights and those rights were being exercised at the time of removal or retention.
  3. The Convention was in force between the two countries at the time of wrongful removal or retention.
  4. The child is under 16 years of age.

RETURNING OF THE CHILD

If your child/children have been wrongfully removed from your home in Washington State and taken overseas, you need to move fast.

The return of an internationally abducted child is often settled through negotiation or with the left-behind parents filing a civil petition pursuant through the Hague Convention. Deciding whether to file a Hague application is an important decision and must be considered based on each case’s specific circumstances. If a court decides the child must be returned to its country of habitual residence, they may make the return contingent upon certain obligations from the petitioning parents. This might include:

  • Paying for the travel of the respondent and child to the country where the child habitually resides.
  • Arranging housing or paying for living expenses for the respondent and child in the country of the child’s habitual residence.
  • An order that the petitioner have no contact with the respondent if the respondent returns to the country of the child’s habitual residence.
  • An order that the petitioner will have no contact or limited contact with the child once the child returns to the country of the habitual residence.

POSSIBLE DEFENSES AGAINST THE HAGUE CONVENTION

Under the Hague Convention, a court may deny the return of a child if one of the following applies:

  • There is a grave risk that the child’s return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation.
  • The child objects to being returned and has attained an age and degree of maturity at which the court can take account of the child’s views.
  • More than one year has passed since the wrongful removal or retention occurred and the child has settled in their new environment.
  • The party seeking return consented to or subsequently acquiesced to the child’s removal or retention.
  • The return would violate the fundamental principles of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the county where the child is being held.
  • The party seeking return was not exercising the right of custody at the time of the wrongful removal or retention.

HIRING A HAGUE CONVENTION LAWYER 

In acts of desperation, some parents may consider using extra-judicial forms of recovery, such as personally traveling to the foreign country to recover a child. Although it may seem easier and faster to use extra-judicial methods, they often violate U.S. federal laws and the laws of the foreign country involved, and may potentially exacerbate the situation.

With the difficulty of international child abduction and Hague Convention cases, you should instead hire an attorney with extensive international law experience and Hague Convention cases across the globe. Ultimately, working with the family court system to resolve custody issues is the best avenue for ensuring the safety of all parents and children involved.


About Masters Law Group

At Masters Law Group, we are highly experienced in international and family law matters. Our goal is to make the legal system easier to navigate for our clients. We will make sure you clearly understand the legal situation and your rights so you can make the best decisions for you and your family.

Instead of trying to navigate international law issues alone, take advantage of the experience and knowledge of our attorneys at Masters Law Group. We are committed to vigorously representing clients in these high-stakes proceedings.

Contact us to schedule your consultation here today.